Monday, February 23, 2009

alone

When I have large, obvious struggles I easily find myself on my knees before God; and yet when it comes to the general malaise of life, of struggles that have gone on so long that I scarcely recognize them as being unnatural any longer, I constantly appeal to my own strengths and my own efforts. I make God into a pinch hitter, I refuse to start him but call on him when I think I need something extra.

I’ve recently come to realize the loneliness that I struggle with. C.S. Lewis describes a fictional hell in his book The Great Divorce. Hell is not a place of fire and brimstone, for him it is place where everyone is truly alone— man was not made to be alone. Though I would hardly describe Boston as being hell (its certainly too cold for that), I do feel at times that I am disturbingly alone amidst all the events, activities, and opportunities.

Since I came to Boston in the fall of 2004 I’ve never felt remotely satisfied with my community. I never felt a real connection with anyone, feeling always an outsider, a temporary visitor in any social situation. This often surprises people because in many social situations I’m often the guy standing on the stage crying out for attention – crying out “wolf”. There is a void in my calling out for real community, real fellowship. I try to feed this hunger through the pursuit of women, the drive to be the center of attention, the tiring attempt to be “involved”.

Today, I feel completely wasted by all of my efforts. I know that the only fulfiller is the Lord and the only satisfaction I may see on Earth, should I ever see any at all, can come from Him.

I always joke that I am desperate for community. My hope is that the truth of this desperation can draw me closer to God rather than to the things of this world.

4 comments:

Ben said...

how about we get a drink and discuss god? haha

Joe Nahhas said...

I did cut the crap
and the crap is Nobel prize winner crap
Lorentz length contraction historical confusion with Light aberration
By Professor Joe Nahhas 1977

Abstract: What we see is not what we measure. Distance measurement using signals introduces time delays because
Present time = present time
Present time = past time + [present time - past time]
Present time = past time + time delays

An object of length r could be seen longer or shorter if it extended or shortened Exp (λ t) or twisted Exp (í ω t) making it in general r Exp [λ + í ω] t. If the length of an object is not extended or shortened then λ = 0 and it could be seen as a twisted visual effect.

Then r -------------------------- Visual r = S = r Exp í ω t

If actual motion is r then time Visual motion is S where S = r Exp [ỉ ω t] caused by light
aberrations visual effects as follows:

Exp [ỉ ω t] = [cosine ω t + ỉ sine ω t]; From S = r Exp [ỉ ω t] we can show that
It changes to: S = r [cosine ω t + ỉ sine ω t]
= r {√ [1- sine² ω t]} + ỉ sine ω t
= S x + ỉ S y

Light aberration: ω t = arc tan (v/c)


Where S x = r √ [1- sine² arc tan (v/c)]; And S y = sine arc tan (v/c); ω t = arc tan (v/c)

With v/c << 1 then; Where S x = √ [1- sine² arc tan (v/c)]; And S y = cosine arc tan (v/c)
In absolute value S = r
Along the line of measurement:

S x = √ [1- sine² arc tan (v/c)] = r √ [1- (v/c) ²]

S x = r √ [1- (v/c) ²]

This is the equation for length contraction of Lorentz's used in Einstein's theories
But it is the light aberrations visual effects and it is "apparent" and not real except on Campus.

Joe Nahhas said...

Harvard Einstein's Crap shredded
Einstein's constant velocity of light historical mistake
By Professor Joe Nahhas 1977

Abstract: What we see is not what we measure. Distance measurement using signals introduces time delays
Present time = present time
Present time = past time + [present time - past time]
Present time = past time + time delays
An object of length r could be seen longer or shorter if it extended or shortened Exp (λ t) or twisted Exp (í ω t) making it in general r Exp [λ + í ω] t. If the length of an object is not extended or shortened then λ = 0 and it could be seen as a twisted visual effect.
Then r -------------------------- Visual r = S = r Exp í ω t
If actual motion is r then time Visual motion is S where S = r Exp [ỉ ω t] caused by light aberration visual effects as follows:
With Exp [ỉ ω t] = [cosine ω t + ỉ sine ω t]
From r changing to S = r Exp [ỉ ω t]
It changes to: S = r [cosine ω t + ỉ sine ω t]
= r {√ [1- sine² ω t]} + ỉ sine ω t
= S x + ỉ S y
Light aberration: ω t = arc tan (v/c)
Where S x = r √ [1- sine² arc tan (v/c)]; And S y = sine arc tan (v/c); ω t = arc tan (v/c)
With v/c << 1 then; Where S x = √ [1- sine² arc tan (v/c)]; And S y = cosine arc tan (v/c)
In absolute value S = r
Along the line of measurement:
S x = √ [1- sine² arc tan (v/c)] = r √ [1- (v/c) ²]
S x = r √ [1- (v/c) ²]
This is the equation for length contraction of Lorentz's used in Einstein's theories
But it is the light aberrations visual effects and it is "apparent" and not real except on Campus.
Einstein said: if S x = c Γ and r = c t
1- Principle of constant velocity of light
Then Γ = t √ [1- (v/c) ²]
2- This is time dilation

Taking velocity of light as constant changes distance visual effects to time dilation effects and relativity theory can be derived and was born from two mistakes Lorentz's length contraction and Einstein's constant velocity of light. When Physicists accepted these two mistakes of Lorentz's and of Einstein's Physicists magic sock was created to say anything publish anything based on nothing for jobs money prestige Nobel Prizes and no physics

Joe Nahhas said...

Cutting 350 years of crap
By Joe Alexander Nahhas
I am Joe Nahhas discovered at age 15 in summer of 1973 that all of physics for past 350 years is mathematically solved in event time or lab time and later these same events will look different if measured in real time and will have different values and what we see later in real time will not be what started. This Phenomenon can be explained as follows:
Present time = present time
Present time = past time + [present time - past time]
Present time = past time + time delays
What we see in present time = what happened in past time + changes
We can not see something that did not happen but we see things after it happened.
Physics live event = passed event + difference between what started and what is seen live

By 1977 at age 19 I found how to solve all of physics in real time and have new physics formulas by the hundreds derived from old physics formulas. These new physics formulas match measurements with unprecedented accuracy to re-write physics and the history of physics because it says 85% of all published physics is based on wrong data and when data corrected it would tell a different world of physics better than anything said or published in the past 350 years. Here
1001 New Physics Formulas antity Event formula
1-Distance r (0) r = r (0) Exp [λ (r) + í ω (r)] t
2-Mass m (0) m = m (0) Exp [λ (m) + í ω (m)] t
3-Time t (0) t = t (0) Exp [λ (t) + í ω (t)] t
4- Velocity v (0) v = {v (0) + [λ (r) + í ω (r)]} Exp [λ (r) + í ω (r)] t
5 - Acceleration γ (0)
γ = {γ (0) + 2 v (0) [λ (t) + í ω (t)] + [λ (r) + í ω (r)] ² r (0)} Exp [λ (r) + í ω (r)] t

6- Length contraction Illusion: r = r (0) √ [1 - sine ² arc tan (v/c)]
7 - Time dilation puzzles: T = T (0) √ [1 - sine ² arc tan (v/c)]
9-Planet-orbit r = r (θ, 0) = a (1-ε²)/ (1+ ε cosine θ) Newton
r (θ, t) = [a (1-ε²)/ (1+ ε cosine θ)] {Exp [λ(r) + ỉ ω (r)]} t
10- Interplanetary telecommunications time delays [Shapiro time delays]
16πGM/c³ (Nahhas) {16πGM/c³ [1 + v°/v*]}
11- Perihelion Advance:
Newton: W= (180x36526x3600/T) (m/M)
Arabian W" (ob) = (-720x36526x3600/T) {[√ (1-ε²)]/ (1-ε) ²} [(v* + v°)/c] ²
12-Global Positioning systems time delays in seconds per day
ΔΓ = (15x720x3600) [(v* + v°)/c] ²
13- Gamma rays and no Neutrino time delays: Δ T = - 2 T (0) sine² {[arc tan (1/n)/2]}; n v = c; n = index of refraction
14- Atomic spectrum: 1/λ = R [1/sine²ω t (1) - 1/sine² ω t (2)]
15 - Rectilinear motion Visual effects ψ (r, t) = Exp ỉ [(p/ħ) r - (E/ħ) t]
16- Rectilinear motion Energy spectrum visual effects: or visual effects of E = T + U
Is: (-ħ/ỉ) ∂ ψ (r, t)/ ∂ t = (- ħ²/2m) [∂² ψ (r, t)/ ∂ r²] + U (r, t) ψ (r, t)
17 - Energy E = mc²/2 visual effects is Δ E = mc²
18- Dark energy Illusions or assumed missing dark energy: Δ E = mc²
19- Energy Illusions 1/3; 2/3; 1 ratio
19- Chadwick Neutron Ghost and proton lost mass: m = m (0) Exp [-λ t]
20- Light bending...21- gravitational red shift...Etc


This is me in October 2009 showing my 1979 stapled picture over my thermo book whispering to the great notable Physicists the Arabs are coming!

For derivations of each of these formulas and their unprecedented accuracy and more formulas I posted 65 articles on: Type: National Philosophy Alliance; Click on the database where scientists are listed by name and click Joe Alexander Nahhas. A complete list of 1001 articles for each formula is being made in a book titled:
1001 New Live Physics formulas